Find the right people
Build a customer interview screener
Turn a recent customer behavior into a recruiting question. Separate the people who use a workflow from the people who buy it, and keep interview notes in your browser.
Build a screener →Start with one useful decision
You do not need a fixed founder identity to start. You need a way to check an assumption, listen to a customer, and decide what to build next.
FounderType brings together practical guides, source-based case discussions, and a short working-style reflection. Use them to turn an idea into a small, observable experiment.
Written and maintained by chengcheng. Full quiz results are free and require no email.
From reflection to action
Choose the resource that matches the uncertainty in front of you. Start with the people closest to the problem, keep evidence separate from inference, then decide what to test.
Find the right people
Turn a recent customer behavior into a recruiting question. Separate the people who use a workflow from the people who buy it, and keep interview notes in your browser.
Build a screener →Validate an assumption
Write down a claim, choose a low-cost test, and decide in advance what result would make you continue, change direction, or stop.
Build your experiment brief →Understand the problem
Use past-behavior questions, distinguish evidence from compliments, and capture what people already do to solve the problem.
Prepare an interview →Reduce the first build
Separate the outcome from the feature list. Keep the smallest end-to-end workflow that can test your next important assumption.
Create a scope boundary →Review customer evidence
Separate observations from interpretations, keep counterexamples visible, and choose a next test that fits the remaining uncertainty.
Read the evidence review guide →A reflection, not a prediction
Twenty hypothetical situations explore four working-style labels: Builder, Visionary, Operator, and Hustler. Your result describes the points assigned to your answers. It does not measure ability, diagnose personality, or predict startup success.
Read the questions, scoring method, and limitations. Answers stay in this page's memory; they are not sent to our server or saved after you reload.
Choose the answer closest to your usual first response, even if several could work. If you have not faced a situation, answer hypothetically.
The labels and weights are an editorial reflection framework, not a validated psychological assessment. No result is a better or worse kind of founder.
Choose an answer, then select Next. Use Tab and the arrow keys to navigate the answer choices.
Your current answer pattern
| Working style | Raw points | Share |
|---|
Shares total 100% after rounding. They describe this set of answers, not population percentiles, fixed personality traits, or chances of success. Small differences need not be meaningful.
Use the result as a prompt for a real decision. Your situation, collaborators, skills, and available evidence matter more than a label.
You can use every profile without taking the quiz. Compare the habits, trade-offs, and exercises rather than treating any label as a permanent identity.
Make it tangible
Turn an idea into something people can try. Pair making with a check that the problem matters.
Read the Builder profile →Connect possibilities
See a possible direction. Turn the big picture into a claim you can test this week.
Read the Visionary profile →Create repeatability
Make a process visible and reliable. Check the goal before optimizing the workflow.
Read the Operator profile →Learn through people
Start conversations and commitments. Keep promises aligned with what can actually be delivered.
Read the Hustler profile →Read with a critical eye
A founder story can illustrate a decision without proving that it caused success. Read the evidence, separate reported facts from interpretation, and consider when the lesson would fail in your own situation.
See our editorial policy for sourcing, corrections, and the distinction between evidence and interpretation.